Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Inject pending interrupt even if pending nmi exist

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 24/03/2016 06:08, Yuki Shibuya wrote:
> I really appreciate your cooperation and valuable discussion. I understand that 
> changing nmi_pending count is not good because it is not guaranteed as safe. 
> Sorry my mistake. 
> 
> I tested the logic suggested by Paolo in our environment, and it worked. I will 
> post v3, replacing second part by this logic.

Great, it would be even better if you could contribute a regression test
using the kvm-unit-tests framework.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux