On 23/03/2016 22:06, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > There is also at least one case where you could have one pending (but > > not injected) and one latched NMI at instruction boundary, and that is > > the special NMI shadow from the STI instruction. > > This sounds to me like we should try to address the issue Yuki is seeing > without playing with the nmi_pending counter. Yes, it would be nice if my suggestion worked. :) Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
