2016-03-23 22:11+0100, Paolo Bonzini: > On 23/03/2016 22:06, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> > There is also at least one case where you could have one pending (but >> > not injected) and one latched NMI at instruction boundary, and that is >> > the special NMI shadow from the STI instruction. >> >> This sounds to me like we should try to address the issue Yuki is seeing >> without playing with the nmi_pending counter. I agree, the discussion was mostly offtopic, sorry. > Yes, it would be nice if my suggestion worked. :) And if not, we'll at least learn what 2.6.32 is doing. :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
