On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24/01/17 05:06, Linu Cherian wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Geetha Akula >> <geethasowjanya.akula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi Marc, >>> >>> We have been testing vfio patches regularly. We are in contact with Eric >>> offline. In fact we are the first one to test V5 patches on Eric request as >>> he had some issue with his test setup. After our feedback it was posted in >>> upstream. >>> We also reported issues found with vfio patches. We been contact with Eric >>> regularly. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Geetha. >>> >>> On 14-Jan-2017 4:17 PM, "Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 14 2017 at 09:53:52 AM, Linu Cherian <linucherian@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> Let me be more precise. At the moment, KVM on arm64 doesn't support the >>>>>> delivery of MSIs generated by physical devices into a guest (patches >>>>>> are >>>>>> in progress, but not merged yet). So unless you used devices that have >>>>>> no need for interrupts, I don't see how this works. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you shed some light on your test process? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We did the testing on top of latest VFIO msi support patches submitted >>>>> by Eric Auger. >>>> >>>> Did you? That's reassuring. It would have been good if any of the Cavium >>>> folks did chime in on the list and help reviewing though - so far, all >>>> I've heard is a deafening silence. I guess there was no hurry for Cavium >>>> to see these patches being merged. >>>> >> >> May i know if this patch is queued for merge. > > Not at the moment, since none of the patches it implicitly depends on > are merged yet either. Once Eric's patches are in (or at least in > -next), this can be queued - assuming it gets some reviewing too. > Marc, Hope this patch will be queued for merge, since Eric's patches has been pulled. Thanks. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
