On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Geetha Akula <geethasowjanya.akula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Marc, > > We have been testing vfio patches regularly. We are in contact with Eric > offline. In fact we are the first one to test V5 patches on Eric request as > he had some issue with his test setup. After our feedback it was posted in > upstream. > We also reported issues found with vfio patches. We been contact with Eric > regularly. > > Thanks, > Geetha. > > On 14-Jan-2017 4:17 PM, "Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 14 2017 at 09:53:52 AM, Linu Cherian <linucherian@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Let me be more precise. At the moment, KVM on arm64 doesn't support the >> >> delivery of MSIs generated by physical devices into a guest (patches >> >> are >> >> in progress, but not merged yet). So unless you used devices that have >> >> no need for interrupts, I don't see how this works. >> >> >> >> Can you shed some light on your test process? >> >> >> > >> > We did the testing on top of latest VFIO msi support patches submitted >> > by Eric Auger. >> >> Did you? That's reassuring. It would have been good if any of the Cavium >> folks did chime in on the list and help reviewing though - so far, all >> I've heard is a deafening silence. I guess there was no hurry for Cavium >> to see these patches being merged. >> May i know if this patch is queued for merge. Thanks. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
