Hi Marc,
We have been testing vfio patches regularly. We are in contact with Eric offline. In fact we are the first one to test V5 patches on Eric request as he had some issue with his test setup. After our feedback it was posted in upstream.
We also reported issues found with vfio patches. We been contact with Eric regularly.
Thanks,
Geetha.
On 14-Jan-2017 4:17 PM, "Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14 2017 at 09:53:52 AM, Linu Cherian <linucherian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Let me be more precise. At the moment, KVM on arm64 doesn't support the
>> delivery of MSIs generated by physical devices into a guest (patches are
>> in progress, but not merged yet). So unless you used devices that have
>> no need for interrupts, I don't see how this works.
>>
>> Can you shed some light on your test process?
>>
>
> We did the testing on top of latest VFIO msi support patches submitted
> by Eric Auger.
Did you? That's reassuring. It would have been good if any of the Cavium
folks did chime in on the list and help reviewing though - so far, all
I've heard is a deafening silence. I guess there was no hurry for Cavium
to see these patches being merged.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm- kernel
_______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
