On 24/01/17 05:06, Linu Cherian wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Geetha Akula > <geethasowjanya.akula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> We have been testing vfio patches regularly. We are in contact with Eric >> offline. In fact we are the first one to test V5 patches on Eric request as >> he had some issue with his test setup. After our feedback it was posted in >> upstream. >> We also reported issues found with vfio patches. We been contact with Eric >> regularly. >> >> Thanks, >> Geetha. >> >> On 14-Jan-2017 4:17 PM, "Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 14 2017 at 09:53:52 AM, Linu Cherian <linucherian@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>>>> Let me be more precise. At the moment, KVM on arm64 doesn't support the >>>>> delivery of MSIs generated by physical devices into a guest (patches >>>>> are >>>>> in progress, but not merged yet). So unless you used devices that have >>>>> no need for interrupts, I don't see how this works. >>>>> >>>>> Can you shed some light on your test process? >>>>> >>>> >>>> We did the testing on top of latest VFIO msi support patches submitted >>>> by Eric Auger. >>> >>> Did you? That's reassuring. It would have been good if any of the Cavium >>> folks did chime in on the list and help reviewing though - so far, all >>> I've heard is a deafening silence. I guess there was no hurry for Cavium >>> to see these patches being merged. >>> > > May i know if this patch is queued for merge. Not at the moment, since none of the patches it implicitly depends on are merged yet either. Once Eric's patches are in (or at least in -next), this can be queued - assuming it gets some reviewing too. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
