Scott Beamer wrote:> Matthew Woehlke wrote:>> Scott Beamer wrote:>>> 1024x768 is soooo 20th century... ;)>> I know; my Asus is 1024x600. Widescreen FTW!>>>> (And yes, there is a bit of sarcasm in the above. Or, put less obtusely,>> I disagree that we can assume larger than 1024x768, given clear evidence>> to the contrary.)> > Oops.> > I keep forgetting. When it comes to any kind of display, (be it on a PC, laptop or TV) there are generally two kinds of people. Those who like displays that are BIG (that be me) and those who like displays that are really small. :)
Hehe :-). Don't get me wrong, my *desktop* runs 1920x1200. Settling on less than 1600x1200 (which I swore I'd never do) was a concession to the fact that 1024x600 seems to be the *only* resolution available in netbooks, and I wanted a netbook. (It had a lot to do with the geekiness factor, the $300 price tag at a brick-and-mortar where I could walk out with it, and that my old laptop - 1600x1200, btw - was about to snap in two.) If I weren't buying a tiny computer, I'd insist on something with a much greater number of pixels. But I'd be lying if I said I didn't love my little eee anyway ;-).
As is, people have told me that the Asus' screen is too dang small. I happen to disagree :-) (probably similar to how I demand high resolution in my full-sized displays, even when "full-sized" is only 17").
> On a related note, there are people who have netbooks *&* desktops with 30" monitors.
I think mine is only 24" :-).
-- MatthewPlease do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.-- このテキストを翻訳する時間の無駄だばかばかしい
___________________________________________________This message is from the kde mailing list.Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
