Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Scott Beamer wrote:
>> Richard Hartmann wrote:
>>> With KDE 4, I have always felt that screen real estate is 'wasted' a lot
>>> more than with KDE 3. The overall visual effect of KDE 4 is rather
>>> pleasing, but on a screen with 1024x768, I need to minimize the size
>>> of widgets and decorations.
>>
>> 1024x768 is soooo 20th century... ;)
>
> I know; my Asus is 1024x600. Widescreen FTW!
>
> (And yes, there is a bit of sarcasm in the above. Or, put less obtusely,
> I disagree that we can assume larger than 1024x768, given clear evidence
> to the contrary.)
Oops.
I keep forgetting. When it comes to any kind of display, (be it on a PC, laptop or TV) there are generally two kinds of people. Those who like displays that are BIG (that be me) and those who like displays that are really small. :)
I should have said "middle of the road resolutions are soooo 20th century".
On a related note, there are people who have netbooks *&* desktops with 30" monitors.
I just don't get small. But I'm weird like that. :)
Scott
(who has never even owned a laptop - perhaps someday....).
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde mailing list.
Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
