On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 08:25:04AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:25:38PM -0800, O'Rourke, Tom wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:41:26AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 05:31:34PM -0800, Tom.O'Rourke@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > From: Tom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Updated gen6|8_enable_rps() for Haswell and Broadwell
> > > > to use the efficient frequency read from pcode.
> > > >
> > > > Added hsw_use_efficient_freq() to read efficient
> > > > frequency (aka RPe) from pcode. The efficiency is
> > > > based on the frequency/power ratio (MHz/W); this is
> > > > considering GT power and not package power. The
> > > > efficent frequency is the highest frequency for which
> > > > the frequency/power ratio is within some threshold of
> > > > the highest frequency/power ratio.
> > > >
> > > > Also set the min_freq_softlimit to the efficient
> > > > frequency. A fixed decrease in frequency results in
> > > > smaller decrease in power at frequencies less than RPe
> > > > than at frequencies above RPe.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > index d43fa0e..6fbfdec 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > > @@ -6010,6 +6010,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
> > > > #define GEN6_ENCODE_RC6_VID(mv) (((mv) - 245) / 5)
> > > > #define GEN6_DECODE_RC6_VID(vids) (((vids) * 5) + 245)
> > > > #define DISPLAY_IPS_CONTROL 0x19
> > > > +#define HSW_PCODE_DYNAMIC_DUTY_CYCLE_CONTROL 0x1A
> > > > #define GEN6_PCODE_DATA 0x138128
> > > > #define GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_IA_RATIO_SHIFT 8
> > > > #define GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_RING_RATIO_SHIFT 16
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > index 300d7e5..e4347d9 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > > > @@ -4706,6 +4706,18 @@ static void parse_rp_state_cap(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 rp_state_c
> > > > dev_priv->rps.min_freq_softlimit = dev_priv->rps.min_freq;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void hsw_use_efficient_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > >
> > > use_efficient_freq() ?
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this be:
> > >
> > > parse_rp_state_cap()
> > > {
> > > ...
> > > dev_priv->rps.efficient_freq = rps_rpe_freq(dev_priv);
> > > ...
> > > }
> > >
> > The parse_rp_state_cap() function is for parsing the
> > RP_STATE_CAP register. The pcode read to get the
> > efficient frequency seems out of scope.
>
> Rename it then. The function that sets rpe seems to be the ideal point
> to set rpe...
Well reading the rpe value seems to be platforms specific. I think
updating the comment as I've suggested is good enough, even when not
really pretty.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
