Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use efficient frequency for HSW/BDW

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 05:31:34PM -0800, Tom.O'Rourke@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Tom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Updated gen6|8_enable_rps() for Haswell and Broadwell
> to use the efficient frequency read from pcode.
> 
> Added hsw_use_efficient_freq() to read efficient
> frequency (aka RPe) from pcode.  The efficiency is
> based on the frequency/power ratio (MHz/W); this is
> considering GT power and not package power.  The
> efficent frequency is the highest frequency for which
> the frequency/power ratio is within some threshold of
> the highest frequency/power ratio.
> 
> Also set the min_freq_softlimit to the efficient
> frequency.  A fixed decrease in frequency results in
> smaller decrease in power at frequencies less than RPe
> than at frequencies above RPe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |    1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index d43fa0e..6fbfdec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -6010,6 +6010,7 @@ enum punit_power_well {
>  #define   GEN6_ENCODE_RC6_VID(mv)		(((mv) - 245) / 5)
>  #define   GEN6_DECODE_RC6_VID(vids)		(((vids) * 5) + 245)
>  #define   DISPLAY_IPS_CONTROL			0x19
> +#define	  HSW_PCODE_DYNAMIC_DUTY_CYCLE_CONTROL	0x1A
>  #define GEN6_PCODE_DATA				0x138128
>  #define   GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_IA_RATIO_SHIFT	8
>  #define   GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_RING_RATIO_SHIFT	16
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 300d7e5..e4347d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4706,6 +4706,18 @@ static void parse_rp_state_cap(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 rp_state_c
>  		dev_priv->rps.min_freq_softlimit = dev_priv->rps.min_freq;
>  }
>  
> +static void hsw_use_efficient_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)

use_efficient_freq() ?

Shouldn't this be:

parse_rp_state_cap()
  {
  ...
  dev_priv->rps.efficient_freq = rps_rpe_freq(dev_priv);
  ...
  }


static in rps_rpe_freq(dev_priv) 
  {
	/* By default, prefer the nominal frequency for efficiency */
	int rpe = dev_priv->rps.rp1_freq;

	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8 || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv)) {
		u32 ddcc_status = 0;
		int ret;

		/* Some useful and informative comment */
		if (sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv,
					   HSW_PCODE_DYNAMIC_DUTY_CYCLE_CONTROL,
					   &ddcc_status) == 0)
			rpe = (ddcc_status >> 8) & 0xff;
	}

	return rpe;
  }

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux