> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nautiyal, Ankit K <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 4:08 PM
> To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: intel-xe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@xxxxxxxxx>;
> jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Deak, Imre <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/dp: Remove HAS_DSC macro for
> intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc
>
> DSC support is already checked before the helper
> intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc is called.
> Remove the check from the helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index d82e25d0dc5a..dd60ca532ae3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -2195,7 +2195,7 @@ static
> u8 intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(struct drm_i915_private *i915) {
> /* Min DSC Input BPC for ICL+ is 8 */
> - return HAS_DSC(i915) ? 8 : 0;
> + return 8;
With this change we don't really need to pass drm_i915_private to this function how about we make it a void function
This also helps us move away from intel_display
Regards,
Suraj Kandpal
> }
>
> static
> --
> 2.45.2
