On 11/27/2024 11:15 AM, Kandpal, Suraj wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Nautiyal, Ankit K <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2024 4:08 PM
To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: intel-xe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@xxxxxxxxx>;
jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Deak, Imre <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/dp: Remove HAS_DSC macro for
intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc
DSC support is already checked before the helper
intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc is called.
Remove the check from the helper.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index d82e25d0dc5a..dd60ca532ae3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -2195,7 +2195,7 @@ static
u8 intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(struct drm_i915_private *i915) {
/* Min DSC Input BPC for ICL+ is 8 */
- return HAS_DSC(i915) ? 8 : 0;
+ return 8;
With this change we don't really need to pass drm_i915_private to this function how about we make it a void function
This also helps us move away from intel_display
Yeah I agree we dont need to pass drm_i915_private. Will fix this.
Regards,
Ankit
Regards,
Suraj Kandpal
}
static
--
2.45.2
