On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 01:44:01PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 11 Oct 2024, Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Introduce DG2_WA subplatform for the devices that will be used in a > > workaround and span across multiple DG2 subplatforms. > > Ditto, give the subplatform a name other than "WA". Look up the specs, > what's in common? This WA is basically for G8 power state which reduces idle power. I initially opted for _G8 but it didn't sit quite well with existing G10, G11 macros which I'm guessing means something else? Perhaps we can use _PM, but it would be a bit misleading as well, since it has nothing to do with Linux PM. Open to suggestions. > > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++------- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 5 +++- > > 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > index 39f6614a0a99..0a68cd9379e8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h > > @@ -548,6 +548,8 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915, > > IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11) > > #define IS_DG2_G12(i915) \ > > IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12) > > +#define IS_DG2_WA(i915) \ > > + IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_WA) > > #define IS_RAPTORLAKE_S(i915) \ > > IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_ALDERLAKE_S, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL) > > #define IS_ALDERLAKE_P_N(i915) \ > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c > > index 3c47c625993e..674ab2a4d75e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c > > @@ -200,6 +200,15 @@ static const u16 subplatform_g12_ids[] = { > > INTEL_DG2_G12_IDS(ID), > > }; > > > > +static const u16 subplatform_dg2_wa_ids[] = { > > + INTEL_DG2_WA_IDS(ID), > > +}; > > + > > +static const u16 subplatform_dg2_ids[] = { > > + INTEL_DG2_IDS(ID), > > + INTEL_ATS_M_IDS(ID), > > +}; > > Nope, you don't need this. > > > + > > static const u16 subplatform_arl_ids[] = { > > INTEL_ARL_IDS(ID), > > }; > > @@ -252,15 +261,22 @@ static void intel_device_info_subplatform_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915) > > if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_rplu_ids, > > ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_rplu_ids))) > > mask |= BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPLU); > > - } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g10_ids, > > - ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g10_ids))) { > > - mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10); > > - } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g11_ids, > > - ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g11_ids))) { > > - mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11); > > - } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g12_ids, > > - ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g12_ids))) { > > - mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12); > > + } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_dg2_ids, > > + ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_dg2_ids))) { > > Nope. Just hoist the below checks to higher level. With that, won't we need to duplicate wa_ids check for each? > > + if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g10_ids, > > + ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g10_ids))) > > + mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10); > > + else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g11_ids, > > + ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g11_ids))) > > + mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11); > > + else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g12_ids, > > + ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g12_ids))) > > + mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12); > > + > > + /* DG2 WA ids span across multiple subplatforms */ > > + if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_dg2_wa_ids, > > + ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_dg2_wa_ids))) > > + mask |= BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_WA); > > } else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_arl_ids, > > ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_arl_ids))) { > > mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ARL); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h > > index 643ff1bf74ee..c3623e859c78 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h > > @@ -95,9 +95,11 @@ enum intel_platform { > > /* > > * Subplatform bits share the same namespace per parent platform. In other words > > * it is fine for the same bit to be used on multiple parent platforms. > > + * Devices can belong to multiple subplatforms if needed, so it's possible to set > > + * multiple bits for same device. > > */ > > > > -#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS (3) > > +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS (4) > > #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_MASK (BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS) - 1) > > > > /* HSW/BDW/SKL/KBL/CFL */ > > @@ -114,6 +116,7 @@ enum intel_platform { > > #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10 0 > > #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11 1 > > #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12 2 > > +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_WA 3 > > > > /* ADL */ > > #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL 0 > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel