Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/dg2: Introduce DG2_WA subplatform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 11 Oct 2024, Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Introduce DG2_WA subplatform for the devices that will be used in a
> workaround and span across multiple DG2 subplatforms.

Ditto, give the subplatform a name other than "WA". Look up the specs,
what's in common?

> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          |  2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h |  5 +++-
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 39f6614a0a99..0a68cd9379e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -548,6 +548,8 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  	IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11)
>  #define IS_DG2_G12(i915) \
>  	IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12)
> +#define IS_DG2_WA(i915) \
> +	IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_DG2, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_WA)
>  #define IS_RAPTORLAKE_S(i915) \
>  	IS_SUBPLATFORM(i915, INTEL_ALDERLAKE_S, INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL)
>  #define IS_ALDERLAKE_P_N(i915) \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> index 3c47c625993e..674ab2a4d75e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> @@ -200,6 +200,15 @@ static const u16 subplatform_g12_ids[] = {
>  	INTEL_DG2_G12_IDS(ID),
>  };
>  
> +static const u16 subplatform_dg2_wa_ids[] = {
> +	INTEL_DG2_WA_IDS(ID),
> +};
> +
> +static const u16 subplatform_dg2_ids[] = {
> +	INTEL_DG2_IDS(ID),
> +	INTEL_ATS_M_IDS(ID),
> +};

Nope, you don't need this.

> +
>  static const u16 subplatform_arl_ids[] = {
>  	INTEL_ARL_IDS(ID),
>  };
> @@ -252,15 +261,22 @@ static void intel_device_info_subplatform_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  		if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_rplu_ids,
>  			       ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_rplu_ids)))
>  			mask |= BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPLU);
> -	} else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g10_ids,
> -			      ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g10_ids))) {
> -		mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10);
> -	} else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g11_ids,
> -			      ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g11_ids))) {
> -		mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11);
> -	} else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g12_ids,
> -			      ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g12_ids))) {
> -		mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12);
> +	} else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_dg2_ids,
> +			      ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_dg2_ids))) {

Nope. Just hoist the below checks to higher level.

> +		if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g10_ids,
> +			       ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g10_ids)))
> +			mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10);
> +		else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g11_ids,
> +				    ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g11_ids)))
> +			mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11);
> +		else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_g12_ids,
> +				    ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_g12_ids)))
> +			mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12);
> +
> +		/* DG2 WA ids span across multiple subplatforms */
> +		if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_dg2_wa_ids,
> +			       ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_dg2_wa_ids)))
> +			mask |= BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_WA);
>  	} else if (find_devid(devid, subplatform_arl_ids,
>  			      ARRAY_SIZE(subplatform_arl_ids))) {
>  		mask = BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_ARL);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index 643ff1bf74ee..c3623e859c78 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -95,9 +95,11 @@ enum intel_platform {
>  /*
>   * Subplatform bits share the same namespace per parent platform. In other words
>   * it is fine for the same bit to be used on multiple parent platforms.
> + * Devices can belong to multiple subplatforms if needed, so it's possible to set
> + * multiple bits for same device.
>   */
>  
> -#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS (3)
> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS (4)
>  #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_MASK (BIT(INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_BITS) - 1)
>  
>  /* HSW/BDW/SKL/KBL/CFL */
> @@ -114,6 +116,7 @@ enum intel_platform {
>  #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G10	0
>  #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G11	1
>  #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_G12	2
> +#define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_WA	3
>  
>  /* ADL */
>  #define INTEL_SUBPLATFORM_RPL	0

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux