[PATCH v2 0/9] drm/i915/display: platform identification with display->is.<PLATFORM>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



v2 of [1]. Please read the cover letter there.

This addresses review comments and adds a few more commits on top, in particular
the last one showcasing the approach.

The main question remains, is this what we want?

BR,
Jani.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1718719962.git.jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx


Jani Nikula (9):
  drm/i915/display: use a macro to initialize subplatforms
  drm/i915/display: use a macro to define platform enumerations
  drm/i915/display: join the platform and subplatform enums
  drm/i915/display: add display platforms structure with platform
    members
  drm/i915/display: add platforms "is" member to struct intel_display
  drm/i915/display: remove the display platform enum as unnecessary
  drm/i915/display: consider HSW/BDW ULX to also be ULT
  drm/i915/display: keep subplatforms next to their platforms
  drm/i915/bios: use display->is.PLATFORM instead of IS_PLATFORM()

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c     |  36 ++--
 .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h |   3 +
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c   |  89 ++++++---
 .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h   | 180 ++++++++++--------
 4 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.2




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux