Re: [PATCH 13/26] drm/i915: Compute clocks earlier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 03 May 2022, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Do the DPLL computation before fastset checks. This should
> allow us to get rid of all that horrible fuzzy clock handling
> for fastsets. Who knows how many bugs there are caused by our
> state not actually matching what the hardware will generate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 8d6cbfbaf20d..1a25addadc21 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -2818,6 +2818,10 @@ static int intel_crtc_compute_config(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	ret = intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock(state, crtc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	ret = intel_crtc_compute_pipe_src(crtc_state);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -7783,10 +7787,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
>  		if (intel_crtc_needs_modeset(new_crtc_state)) {
>  			any_ms = true;
>  
> -			ret = intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock(state, crtc);
> -			if (ret)
> -				goto fail;
> -
>  			intel_release_shared_dplls(state, crtc);
>  			continue;
>  		}

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux