Hi Tejas, As per your request triggered resume run on RKL CI machine, the testcases which chris mentioned were passing with this run, Please find the below logs for your reference Git ID : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2743 igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-ringfull@vcs0 : https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9432/re-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-ringfull@xxxxxxxxx igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-common@vcs0 : https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9432/re-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-common@xxxxxxxxx Regards, Jaswanth Kattamanchi -----Original Message----- From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 4:38 PM To: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Pandey, Hariom <hariom.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kattamanchi, JaswanthX <jaswanthx.kattamanchi@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Naramasetti, LaxminarayanaX <laxminarayanax.naramasetti@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection + Jaswant > -----Original Message----- > From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > Sent: 03 December 2020 09:44 > To: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Pandey, Hariom > <hariom.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove > require_force_probe protection > > Hi Jaswant, > > Can you please re-run resume run on CI as well as local setup and > share results here? If it passes in full resume run in either of setup > we are good go with. > > Thanks, > Tejas > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: 30 November 2020 20:31 > > To: Pandey, Hariom <hariom.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>; Surendrakumar > Upadhyay, > > TejaskumarX <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@xxxxxxxxx>; intel- > > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove > > require_force_probe protection > > > > Quoting Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX (2020-11-30 14:45:14) > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > The failing test was not part of BAT run, it ran in CI resume run > > > and failed > > there, however on manual run the same test got passed. Please find > > attached results. > > > > One pass versus a major failure is not satisfactory. > > > > We can not say we are happy with the hardware/driver until it is > > reliable, and forcewake is of fundamental importance for mmio > > access, as well as execution. > > -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
