+ Jaswant > -----Original Message----- > From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > Sent: 03 December 2020 09:44 > To: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Pandey, Hariom > <hariom.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe > protection > > Hi Jaswant, > > Can you please re-run resume run on CI as well as local setup and share > results here? If it passes in full resume run in either of setup we are good go > with. > > Thanks, > Tejas > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: 30 November 2020 20:31 > > To: Pandey, Hariom <hariom.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>; Surendrakumar > Upadhyay, > > TejaskumarX <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@xxxxxxxxx>; intel- > > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove > > require_force_probe protection > > > > Quoting Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX (2020-11-30 14:45:14) > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > The failing test was not part of BAT run, it ran in CI resume run > > > and failed > > there, however on manual run the same test got passed. Please find > > attached results. > > > > One pass versus a major failure is not satisfactory. > > > > We can not say we are happy with the hardware/driver until it is > > reliable, and forcewake is of fundamental importance for mmio access, > > as well as execution. > > -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
