Hi Chris, Are below results satisfying? Thanks, Tejas > -----Original Message----- > From: Kattamanchi, JaswanthX <jaswanthx.kattamanchi@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 04 December 2020 15:11 > To: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@xxxxxxxxx>; Chris Wilson > <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Pandey, Hariom <hariom.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>; > intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Naramasetti, LaxminarayanaX <laxminarayanax.naramasetti@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe > protection > > Hi Tejas, > > As per your request triggered resume run on RKL CI machine, the testcases > which chris mentioned were passing with this run, Please find the below logs > for your reference > > Git ID : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2743 > > igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-ringfull@vcs0 : https://intel-gfx- > ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9432/re-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi- > ringfull@xxxxxxxxx > > igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-common@vcs0 : https://intel-gfx- > ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9432/re-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi- > common@xxxxxxxxx > > Regards, > Jaswanth Kattamanchi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 4:38 PM > To: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Pandey, Hariom > <hariom.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kattamanchi, > JaswanthX <jaswanthx.kattamanchi@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Naramasetti, LaxminarayanaX <laxminarayanax.naramasetti@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe > protection > > + Jaswant > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > > Sent: 03 December 2020 09:44 > > To: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Pandey, Hariom > > <hariom.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove > > require_force_probe protection > > > > Hi Jaswant, > > > > Can you please re-run resume run on CI as well as local setup and > > share results here? If it passes in full resume run in either of setup > > we are good go with. > > > > Thanks, > > Tejas > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: 30 November 2020 20:31 > > > To: Pandey, Hariom <hariom.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>; Surendrakumar > > Upadhyay, > > > TejaskumarX <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@xxxxxxxxx>; intel- > > > gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove > > > require_force_probe protection > > > > > > Quoting Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX (2020-11-30 14:45:14) > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > > > The failing test was not part of BAT run, it ran in CI resume run > > > > and failed > > > there, however on manual run the same test got passed. Please find > > > attached results. > > > > > > One pass versus a major failure is not satisfactory. > > > > > > We can not say we are happy with the hardware/driver until it is > > > reliable, and forcewake is of fundamental importance for mmio > > > access, as well as execution. > > > -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
