On Fri, 24 Jan 2020, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 01:54:58PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: >> Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-01-24 13:25:21) >> > Hey all, >> > >> > So I sent [1] to convert some forcewake register accessors... but what if we >> > just ripped off the bandage once and for all? It's going to hurt, a lot, but >> > we'd get it done. >> > >> > This completely rids us of the "dev_priv" dependency in display/. >> > >> > All the patches here are per-file and independent of each other. We could also >> > pick and apply the ones that are least likely to conflict. >> > >> > Opinions? >> > >> > >> > BR, >> > Jani. >> > >> > >> > PS. I didn't bother looking at the checkpatch warnings this may generate at this >> > point. I just used the --linux-spacing option for spatch, and closed my eyes. I >> > completely scripted the generation of the series, apart from just a couple of >> > build fixes. >> >> Yup. Suck it all in, clean up with the usual code refreshes. >> Schadenfreude-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> I've looked at a couple of patches to confirm that it does appear purely >> mechanical, >> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Since it is purely mechanical with coccinelle, why not to make in only one patch? Because such a mega patch would conflict before being able to merge. You'd have to block everything else. I don't think I'd be able to merge these in one go either even if we wanted to. > Anyway: > Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Jani. > >> -Chris >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-gfx mailing list >> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
