On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 01:54:58PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-01-24 13:25:21) > > Hey all, > > > > So I sent [1] to convert some forcewake register accessors... but what if we > > just ripped off the bandage once and for all? It's going to hurt, a lot, but > > we'd get it done. > > > > This completely rids us of the "dev_priv" dependency in display/. > > > > All the patches here are per-file and independent of each other. We could also > > pick and apply the ones that are least likely to conflict. > > > > Opinions? > > > > > > BR, > > Jani. > > > > > > PS. I didn't bother looking at the checkpatch warnings this may generate at this > > point. I just used the --linux-spacing option for spatch, and closed my eyes. I > > completely scripted the generation of the series, apart from just a couple of > > build fixes. > > Yup. Suck it all in, clean up with the usual code refreshes. > Schadenfreude-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I've looked at a couple of patches to confirm that it does appear purely > mechanical, > Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Since it is purely mechanical with coccinelle, why not to make in only one patch? Anyway: Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
