On 14/01/2020 11:37, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 14/01/2020 11:06, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Chris Wilson (2020-01-14 10:56:47)
The rc6 residency starts ticking from 0 from BIOS POST, but the kernel
starts measuring the time from its boot. If we start measuruing
I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY while the GT is idle, we start our sampling from
0 and then upon first activity (park/unpark) add in all the rc6
residency since boot. After the first park with the sampler engaged, the
sleep/active counters are aligned.
v2: With a wakeref to be sure
Fixes: df6a42053513 ("drm/i915/pmu: Ensure monotonic rc6")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
index 28a82c849bac..ec0299490dd4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
@@ -637,8 +637,10 @@ static void i915_pmu_enable(struct perf_event
*event)
container_of(event->pmu, typeof(*i915), pmu.base);
unsigned int bit = event_enabled_bit(event);
struct i915_pmu *pmu = &i915->pmu;
+ intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
unsigned long flags;
+ wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm);
I think it would be nicer to use with_intel_runtime_pm directly at the
__get_rc6 call site. That would show/localise where it is actually needed.
Spinlock though, my bad.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
