Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-25 14:26:53)
>
> On 25/01/2018 13:57, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-01-25 13:33:32)
> >> - if (engine && ((caps & engine->caps) != caps))
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >> + do {
> >> + engine = i915->engine[_VCS(instance)];
> >> + instance ^= 1;
> >> + vcs_instances--;
> >> + } while ((caps & engine->caps) != caps && vcs_instances > 0);
> >> +
> >> + if ((caps & engine->caps) != caps)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + timeline = i915_gem_context_lookup_timeline_class(eb->ctx,
> >> + VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS);
> >> + spin_lock_irq(&timeline->lock);
> >> + prev_req = list_first_entry_or_null(&timeline->requests,
> >> + struct drm_i915_gem_request,
> >> + ctx_link);
> >> + spin_unlock_irq(&timeline->lock);
> >
> > This isn't doing anything yet as we aren't using the timeline. The idea
> > is sound though, we need to rejig timelines to make them more flexible
> > so that we can combine them to use one per-queue. Ok.
>
> I think it works - as far as I looked at the trace.pl HTML output it
> seems to.
You are syncing against the oldest, not the previous (which would be
timeline->last_request).
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
