On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 10:18:32AM +0200, Tomi Sarvela wrote: > On 02/11/17 19:08, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 04:34:26PM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > > > == Series Details == > > > > > > Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Check if the stolen memory "reserved" area is enabled or not > > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33060/ > > > State : warning > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > Test kms_busy: > > > Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-oldfb-with-reset-render-A: > > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (shard-hsw) > > > Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-newfb-with-reset-render-B: > > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (shard-hsw) > > > > Hmm. The warn was there already AFAICS. I wonder why this is claiming > > things were passing? > > The sharded result for the run is 'warning'. What do you mean? https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6930/shards.html The comparison is done to CI_DRM_3309 according to this, and kms_busy@extended-modeset-hang-newfb-with-reset-render-B was dmesg-warn there. Why is the above diff showing pass -> DMESG-WARN? -- Petri Latvala _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
