On 02/11/17 19:08, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 04:34:26PM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Check if the stolen memory "reserved" area is enabled or not
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/33060/
State : warning
== Summary ==
Test kms_busy:
Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-oldfb-with-reset-render-A:
dmesg-warn -> PASS (shard-hsw)
Subgroup extended-modeset-hang-newfb-with-reset-render-B:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (shard-hsw)
Hmm. The warn was there already AFAICS. I wonder why this is claiming
things were passing?
The sharded result for the run is 'warning'. What do you mean?
Also shard-glkb didn't seem to get any results from this run. No idea
why, nor why this summary fails to mention that fact.
One GLK died, and 4 GLKs take nearly 90 minutes to run shards. It's not
reasonable to wait for them on every run and queue everything else, so
Patchwork/Trybot runs are skipped on GLK. Anything can be run and added
to results manually, if needed.
As a comparison, SNB/HSW/APL all run shards in ~35 minutes. KBL is the
only one that gets rebooted between shards (due to leaking context), and
takes around 50 minutes.
Oh and BTW the boot/dmesg links from the shard results don't seem to
work very well. Sometimes it just gets you an empty log and you have
to manually find a file that has some actual content in it.
If there is no bootlog for a run, the host has not booted between runs.
It's maybe not intuitively clear. I've tried to communicate that the
shard runs are shifting to conditional reboots (booted only if hung).
Tomi
shard-hsw total:2539 pass:1432 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:8 skip:1097 time:9313s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6930/shards.html
Looking at the results we go from
<7>[ 2.822784] [drm:i915_ggtt_probe_hw [i915]] GTT stolen size = 128M
<7>[ 2.826115] [drm:i915_gem_init_stolen [i915]] Stolen reserved area
[0x0000000001100000 - 0x0000000001200000] outside stolen memory
[0x00000000c7a00000 - 0x00000000cfa00000]
to
<7>[ 2.909693] [drm:i915_ggtt_probe_hw [i915]] GTT stolen size = 128M
<7>[ 2.912226] [drm:i915_gem_init_stolen [i915]] Memory reserved for
graphics device: 131072K, usable: 131072K
on shard-snb6 at least.
After going through the dmesgs for all the other machines we have in ci,
it doesn't look like there were any other changes in the amount of stolen
memory we detect (well, couldn't check shard-glkb due to lack fo results).
There is GLK in Farm1, so you can check the bootlogs from fast-feedback
run if that part is what you're interested in. All the other gens too.
Tomi
--
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
