Re: mailboxes.db backend comparison

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On May 22, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:

On Mon, 22 May 2006, Patrick Radtke wrote:


On May 18, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:

On Wed, 17 May 2006, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 17 May 2006, at 14:21, Andrew Morgan wrote:
My most recent test was to rebuild the mupdate master mailboxes.db from my backend server.
skiplist - 20-25 minutes
berkeley - 3 minutes

How many mailboxes are there?

About 145000.

Is there also a speed difference when running
'time ctl_mboxlist -mw'

from your backends?

That's what I did.  :)

haha, yup:) I should have been clearer.
I want to know the diff speed, not the rebuild speed.

So how long does ctl_mboxlist -mw take to run when the mupdate master is in sync with the backend.

For example,

with backend and murder master in sync, ctl_mboxlist takes 16 seconds to run here. If I'm rebuilding the murder master db from scratch then it takes 2+ hours.

We have 782443 mailboxes, divided up across a bunch of backends.

I would like the speed of berkley, but I don't trust it to be stable.

-Patrick

----
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux