Yes, we are all worried.
The LLC (and I presume the IESG / IRTF / ...) are trying to do the right
thing.
Jay has posted as set of evaluation criteria.
Given that "when enough of us think it is safe" is both a bad criteria
and unusable, I applaud the efforts to write down and discuss with us
those criteria.
While I understand the concerns in many of the notes, I am having
trouble seeing how Jay or anyone else can translate those concerns into
well-defined criteria that can be used to reach an appropriate decision.
I think I understand that folks have suggested different numbers in the
criteria for whether there are incoming or outgoing isolation
requirements. That part of the discussion is well-defined criteria. It
is the rest of it that has me confused. I even sympathize with Ron's
"some of us are at more risk than others". I just don't know how to
translate that into criteria.
And no, asking the IETF members on the ground in a given place is not
data. It is anecdotes.
Yours,
joel
