On 2 Apr 2020, at 16:37, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 03-Apr-20 09:13, Adam Roach wrote:
On 4/2/2020 2:27 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
Looking at the above - perhaps this is better done as a combination
of
permanent and temporary changes to BCP 10?
This is exactly the kind of scope creep that I (and others) had been
worried about
Agreed. Make this document strictly limited to this year's problem.
Long term amendments can be done on a more relaxed timescale.
I support this draft plus the clarifying changes suggested by
Adrian/Barry.
Yep. Since Mike has said that he is "not opposed to leaving the document
as is", let's do that. Let's just commit to getting the bigger changes
done before IETF 110.
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
