On 24/3/20 21:35, Toerless Eckert wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:42:56PM -0300, Fernando Gont wrote:
On 24/3/20 13:55, Toerless Eckert wrote:
[...]
I think it would also be good to create a
"pay what you think is appropriate" for remote attendants,
maybe even with a bit of public shaming by publishing this
in the attendance list.
I have no idea the principles under which, in a situation where there's
individual vs. corporate and funded vs. non-funded and participation from
countries with totally different economic situations and currency exchange
rates, such a list could be a data source for "shaming"...
If i remember correctly, except for students, everybody pays the
same, right ?
There are one-days passes, too.
Is that fairer ?
It is not. But since this would be introduced, I guess it could be made
fairer from starters.
Talk about diversity....
Indeed. Here is another crazy idea:
Hint for how much you should give for an in-person IETF meeting:
Same amount as your hotel would cost for Mon-Fri.
;-))
That's indeed sensible. Not sure if doable, but certainly sensible. ;-)
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
