SM, the messages you point to are entirely unrelated to IETF Last Call, and will not be affected by this experiment: they will remain on this list, ietf@xxxxxxxx. Barry On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 1:41 PM S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Pete, > At 09:55 AM 14-09-2019, Pete Resnick wrote: > >SM, I think you misunderstood the point of the new list. It's not > >for Last Call announcements; it's for Last Call discussion (i.e., > >individual Last Call comments, area review team reviews, and all of > >their respective replies). Those messages number 50 to 100 per > >month. Moving those messages to a separate list is the experiment. > > Sorry for not being clear. The comment about announcements was about > the ones which are usually sent to ietf@, e.g. > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/f7jzS-V6D4xIgXsGFELx1zx0Kn4 > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7q7vwduyP5JeLqm--YviPU-4uto > > For what it worth, those messages do not generate that many > responses. I understood [1] that the experiment was about moving > those messages to a new mailing list. > > Regards, > S. Moonesamy > > 1. That does not mean that the clarification which you provided is not helpful. >
