|
On 9/2/2019 9:51 PM, Alissa Cooper
wrote:
Hi Alissa - I appreciate you have a particular point of view
about what you think is appropriate discussion on the IETF mailing
list, but I think you're missing the point that what's important
is the topic and its important to more than RFC format geeks (
:-) )that hang out on the rfc-interest mailing list. I also think
you're mis-reading 3005. I don't think we're quite ready to
discuss the technical aspects of the RFC series - and that's the
appropriate set of discussions for rfc-interest, not the
philosophy of the oversight of the RFC series and process.
As SAA, it's rare that such a posting would be considered just a
suggestion. I myself didn't actually take it as just a
suggestion. Eliot beat me in providing pushback. It would be great if people decide to follow his suggestion, as some have already. If not, I am confident that the RSOC and the IAB will take into account what they read here between now and September 14 when the SOW comment period closes and I am optimistic that the discussion on rfc-interest, on this list, and everywhere in the IETF can remain respectful. My hope is that people will use the next 12 days to contemplate the email Sarah sent and provide their feedback. Neither Matthew nor you appear to be reading the same things out
of 3005 as the rest of us - I'd be interested in how you interpret
this topic in a manner to suggest that its an inappropriate topic
for the IETF list.
Later, Mike
|
