> Keith Moore wrote : > IMO it is a Very Bad Idea, because it's a slippery slope from there to making judgments > about who "should" get to attend or who "should" be privileged as to influence policy. I have been waiting 20 years for this. As it turns out, the rest of the world is perfectly happy to leave you and the IETF slip into the oblivion of this non-NAT world. The last 20 years of your contribution to eliminate NAT have been acknowledged, and the marketplace will be happy to quote your positions on it. We are all saved. Thanks to Keith Moore, we now live in an IPv6-only, NAT-free world. Besides the carbon footprint, why don't you all loons solve the peace in the Middle East and world hunger, while you are at it ? The world needs you.
