Don, others who think three meetings are the right number, > On 25 Jul 2019, at 10:46, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am also in favor of keeping three meetings a year. Why three? Why not four, two, five? Here is my claim: we can fly less and be more effective. I am asking simply that the LLC in consultation with the IESG test that statement by finding the right questions, collecting and analyzing data, and then bring the results of their analysis with recommendations to the community for our consideration. I take seriously the need for hallway conversations, hackathons, ad hocs, in addition to our formal meeting time. That has to be taken into account. But it has been some 28 years since we went to three meetings per year. Let’s please do the work to understand what options we have. That’s my request. Do you disagree? Eliot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
