Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@xxxxxx> wrote:
> The experience with other similar YANG modules indicates that the
> process can actually work, see for example
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-if-type/iana-if-type.xhtml
> For users of such modules, it is important to grab the latest revision
> from IANA rather than use the initial revision that appeared in the
> RFC. Perhaps this could be more strongly emphasized in the kick-off
> RFCs.
> While we can think about other procedures and mechanisms, I'd suggest
> that we stick to the current procedure, until something better is
> available.
To be clear... the current proceedure is:
1) we publish an RFC with a YANG module in it, with the current IANA
list from a registry in it.
2) as part of the publication, IANA extracts the YANG modules and puts
it into a repository.
3) when IANA extends the registry, they update the YANG module.
-- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
