Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Leif Johansson <leifj@xxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "rsoc@xxxxxxx" <rsoc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:39:15 +0000
In-reply-to: <429ed9b6-89ab-8530-b898-e72e04e37171@mnt.se>
References: <9817BB4B-D828-4128-A70C-A8B966E6642F@encrypted.net> <429ed9b6-89ab-8530-b898-e72e04e37171@mnt.se>
User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1b.0.190708

>    I don't think its a good idea to include "experience as an RFC author"

Strongly agree.  We want a good technical copy-editor, which strikes almost all RFC authors from consideration, IMO.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
  - From: heather flanagan
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
  - From: Sarah Banks

References:
- RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
  - From: Sarah B
- Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
  - From: Leif Johansson

Prev by Date: Re: Tolerance
Next by Date: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
Previous by thread: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
Next by thread: Re: RFC Series Editor (RSE) Statement of Work
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux