> -----Original Message----- > From: Roman Danyliw > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 2:54 PM > To: 'Mark Nottingham' <mnot@xxxxxxxx>; Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@xxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 12:04 PM > > To: Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Roman Danyliw <rdd@xxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org > > > > Frankly, I want to track how long it takes to generate pages on them, > > because my perception of the performance is that it's pretty bad. I > > don't care about tracking users from page to page, etc. > > I can pass this back to the tools team. This type of performance > measurement is not in scope for this web analytics proposal. I was imprecise. Sorry. Page generation time will be collected but the currently planned set of reports that will analyze it would not focus on performance analysis. Roman > Roman > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > On 21 May 2019, at 5:00 pm, Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >> I agree that tools and datatracker should be included; while the "main" > > site is important, they are the critical resources that most people > > interact with. > > > > > > I believe the community that uses datatracker is, mostly, different > > > from the > > community that uses the main website. What is the point of doing > > analytics -- which community are we mainly trying to assess and > > improve? I believe datatracker has a broad enough input channel for > > improvement and should be left out of this effort. > > > > > > I will be sad on the day that the IETF puts up a "we use cookies" > > > GDPR > > notification. I share Stephen's mild concerns about tracking and privacy. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
