> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 12:04 PM > To: Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Roman Danyliw <rdd@xxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Call for Community Input: Web Analytics on www.ietf.org > > Frankly, I want to track how long it takes to generate pages on them, > because my perception of the performance is that it's pretty bad. I don't care > about tracking users from page to page, etc. I can pass this back to the tools team. This type of performance measurement is not in scope for this web analytics proposal. Roman > Cheers, > > > > On 21 May 2019, at 5:00 pm, Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> I agree that tools and datatracker should be included; while the "main" > site is important, they are the critical resources that most people interact > with. > > > > I believe the community that uses datatracker is, mostly, different from the > community that uses the main website. What is the point of doing analytics -- > which community are we mainly trying to assess and improve? I believe > datatracker has a broad enough input channel for improvement and should > be left out of this effort. > > > > I will be sad on the day that the IETF puts up a "we use cookies" GDPR > notification. I share Stephen's mild concerns about tracking and privacy.. > > > > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
