Agreed. At least one of the sampled messages clearly breaches personal privacy as well as normal decency and should probably be deleted from the archive as quickly as possible to avoid legal issues. Regards Brian Carpenter On 04-May-19 12:12, Kurt Andersen wrote: > Ditto (from a small virtual keyboard) > > On Fri, May 3, 2019, 16:40 Job Snijders <job@xxxxxxx <mailto:job@xxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Dear Adam, others, > > I’ve reviewed BCP83 and the messages you referenced. I believe the postings are off topic and disrupt the IETF process, the proposed PR action is appropriate. > > I wish the involved people all the best. > > Kind regards, > > Job > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 16:09 Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adam@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > The ART area directors have received a request from several individuals to > revoke the posting rights to IETF mailing lists of Pradeep Kumar Xplorer as > per the procedures in BCP 83 (RFC 3683). > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx <mailto:ietf@xxxxxxxx> > mailing lists by 2019-03-17. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to > iesg@xxxxxxxx <mailto:iesg@xxxxxxxx> instead. In either case, please retain the Subject line to > allow > automated sorting. > > PLEASE NOTE: Comments should be limited to the criteria described in BCP 83, > specifically in this case whether the person has posted "discussion of > subjects unrelated to IETF policy, meetings, activities, or technical > concerns" or "unprofessional commentary, regardless of the general subject", > and whether such posts have had an effect to "disrupt the consensus-driven > process." In particular, IT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO MAKE COMMENTS ABOUT THE > POSTER'S STATE OF MIND WHILE MAKING THESE POSTS OR WHETHER THE POSTS > HAVE SOME > BROADER MEANING OUTSIDE OF THE IETF PROCESS. The questions posed by this > Last > Call are whether the posts are off-topic, whether the posts disrupt the > process, and whether the PR-action is the appropriate remedy. > > The following is an incomplete sampling of messages that have been > identified > as being potentially off-topic and disrupting: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/CneRIG1vjNNbFYPW-z7mtUXe8Ik > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ZOczccDHvHHpD6XaYc_UFLTPrYQ > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/hErM9rufrp_qaj8CAHF96itK84I > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/1r0EIqqHCkDgwR32w3MuBSWrOc0 > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/-KvTfv1sl6Z7QSKBHNaKg0UYw28 > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/kT3lDkJvhKeFXSVZaJaXfyXNT24 > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/iqARH4h-OkNdQ7eeziUl66sLFqk > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/k46FrrbEaYzCkKetjL1SapZ6Jq0 > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/7eovYBGvWq-yLmlUgIBCX2fqST0 > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Xw3anU69JWowFQvpbA8NNVsCASI > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/CDwYKiVjwbVNJXD_OyYFc2K91q4 > > /Adam Roach >
