Re: Call for Input: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Pradeep Kumar Xplorer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Adam, others,

I’ve reviewed BCP83 and the messages you referenced. I believe the postings are off topic and disrupt the IETF process, the proposed PR action is appropriate.

I wish the involved people all the best.

Kind regards,

Job

On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 16:09 Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The ART area directors have received a request from several individuals to
revoke the posting rights to IETF mailing lists of Pradeep Kumar Xplorer as
per the procedures in BCP 83 (RFC 3683).

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx
mailing lists by 2019-03-17. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to
iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the Subject line to
allow
automated sorting.

PLEASE NOTE: Comments should be limited to the criteria described in BCP 83,
specifically in this case whether the person has posted "discussion of
subjects unrelated to IETF policy, meetings, activities, or technical
concerns" or "unprofessional commentary, regardless of the general subject",
and whether such posts have had an effect to "disrupt the consensus-driven
process." In particular, IT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO MAKE COMMENTS ABOUT THE
POSTER'S STATE OF MIND WHILE MAKING THESE POSTS OR WHETHER THE POSTS
HAVE SOME
BROADER MEANING OUTSIDE OF THE IETF PROCESS. The questions posed by this
Last
Call are whether the posts are off-topic, whether the posts disrupt the
process, and whether the PR-action is the appropriate remedy.

The following is an incomplete sampling of messages that have been
identified
as being potentially off-topic and disrupting:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/CneRIG1vjNNbFYPW-z7mtUXe8Ik
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ZOczccDHvHHpD6XaYc_UFLTPrYQ
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/hErM9rufrp_qaj8CAHF96itK84I
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/1r0EIqqHCkDgwR32w3MuBSWrOc0
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/-KvTfv1sl6Z7QSKBHNaKg0UYw28
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/kT3lDkJvhKeFXSVZaJaXfyXNT24
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/iqARH4h-OkNdQ7eeziUl66sLFqk
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/k46FrrbEaYzCkKetjL1SapZ6Jq0
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/7eovYBGvWq-yLmlUgIBCX2fqST0
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Xw3anU69JWowFQvpbA8NNVsCASI
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/CDwYKiVjwbVNJXD_OyYFc2K91q4

/Adam Roach


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux