Re: Call for Input: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Pradeep Kumar Xplorer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1

Regards,
Jeff

> On May 3, 2019, at 16:27, Jared Mauch <jared@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Aside from the date below (I assume it was a typo), this seems appropriate after reviewing the sampling of messages.
> 
> - Jared
> 
>> On May 3, 2019, at 5:08 PM, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> The ART area directors have received a request from several individuals to
>> revoke the posting rights to IETF mailing lists of Pradeep Kumar Xplorer as
>> per the procedures in BCP 83 (RFC 3683).
>> 
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
>> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@xxxxxxxx
>> mailing lists by 2019-03-17. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to
>> iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the Subject line to allow
>> automated sorting.
>> 
>> PLEASE NOTE: Comments should be limited to the criteria described in BCP 83,
>> specifically in this case whether the person has posted "discussion of
>> subjects unrelated to IETF policy, meetings, activities, or technical
>> concerns" or "unprofessional commentary, regardless of the general subject",
>> and whether such posts have had an effect to "disrupt the consensus-driven
>> process." In particular, IT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO MAKE COMMENTS ABOUT THE
>> POSTER'S STATE OF MIND WHILE MAKING THESE POSTS OR WHETHER THE POSTS HAVE SOME
>> BROADER MEANING OUTSIDE OF THE IETF PROCESS. The questions posed by this Last
>> Call are whether the posts are off-topic, whether the posts disrupt the
>> process, and whether the PR-action is the appropriate remedy.
>> 
>> The following is an incomplete sampling of messages that have been identified
>> as being potentially off-topic and disrupting:
>> 
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/CneRIG1vjNNbFYPW-z7mtUXe8Ik
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/ZOczccDHvHHpD6XaYc_UFLTPrYQ
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/hErM9rufrp_qaj8CAHF96itK84I
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/1r0EIqqHCkDgwR32w3MuBSWrOc0
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/-KvTfv1sl6Z7QSKBHNaKg0UYw28
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/kT3lDkJvhKeFXSVZaJaXfyXNT24
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/iqARH4h-OkNdQ7eeziUl66sLFqk
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/k46FrrbEaYzCkKetjL1SapZ6Jq0
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/7eovYBGvWq-yLmlUgIBCX2fqST0
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Xw3anU69JWowFQvpbA8NNVsCASI
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/CDwYKiVjwbVNJXD_OyYFc2K91q4
>> 
>> /Adam Roach
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux