Hi Adam, On 03/05/2019 23:35, Adam Roach wrote: > > Nondisclosure agreements are de rigueur Nicely put - [1] defines that as "prescribed or required by fashion..." > for certain types of contractual > relationships nowadays, frequently covering even the existence of the > relationship itself. While obtaining narrow cutouts for evaluation as a > candidate to serve on a board (i.e., disclosure to the NomCom) is a > reasonable exception for candidates to ask of their business partners, > doing so for full public disclosure clearly would not be. I'll just note that your conclusion there is by no means clear to me. That may derive from me having the luxury of having a $dayjob that allows me to remain unfashionable:-) But that doesn't make me wrong, I think. S. [1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/de%20rigueur
Attachment:
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
