Hello,
At 08:32 PM 22-04-2019, Michael StJohns wrote:
Instead, I'd like to propose that we move to an expulsion model for
the IAB and IESG where the members of the organizations are able to
remove a member under certain circumstances: Behavior inconsistent
with a fiduciary (e.g. acting for your company or contracting entity
to the detriment of the standards process); behavior that adversely
affects the standardization process (IESG) or behavior that
adversely affects the general operation of the IAB (e.g. things like
harassment); abandonment of the position or lack of communication
from the member.
There is the following in Section 2.2:
The "nomcom qualified" requirement for a recall petition is contrary
to the spirit and one of the goals of the Internet Standards Process
[RFC2026] about procedures which are intended to be fair.
Would the decision of an Area Director/IESG not to sponsor the draft
be considered as behaviour that adversely affect the standardization process?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
