Christian Huitema wrote:
> You filed an errata to remove your authorship.
> That errata should be rejected
I've been pondering about this. Is there a need for a mechanism to solve
cases like this? Should we allow authors to distant themselves from
previous work, by making a brief statement in an errata? Maybe we should.
I think I could live with an errata to RFC7421, stating what was stated
and leave the RFC itself in tact. The most appropriate status for it
would probably be: 'Held for Document Update'[1].
Would that work for for you, Alexandre?
--
Marco
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/
