Alissa Cooper <alissa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We actually had that in the graph the secretariat originally produced,
> but took it out for the plenary slide since I didn’t want to overload
> people with information for a slide that wasn’t going to be on the
> screen very long. You can see it here:
> https://datastudio.google.com/reporting/
> 1QceS5g7XvELBUObRDIApjxjZg2a08plH/page/YHqZ?s=veSmL7Dy01g
I looked at the slide, and I noticed that the nomcom-eligible line seems to
go up and down in sync with the new attendees line. I'd think if there is
any relationship there should be a delay of 3-5 meetings. So I'm wondering
if I am reading the graph correctly.
Does the datastudio permit people to run what-if scenarios without violating
the privacy of the data source? Does it match people who remote attended
with their in-person attendance?
I'd specifically like to run some nomcom-remain-eligible scenarios.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
