Alissa Cooper <alissa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We actually had that in the graph the secretariat originally produced, > but took it out for the plenary slide since I didn’t want to overload > people with information for a slide that wasn’t going to be on the > screen very long. You can see it here: > https://datastudio.google.com/reporting/ > 1QceS5g7XvELBUObRDIApjxjZg2a08plH/page/YHqZ?s=veSmL7Dy01g I looked at the slide, and I noticed that the nomcom-eligible line seems to go up and down in sync with the new attendees line. I'd think if there is any relationship there should be a delay of 3-5 meetings. So I'm wondering if I am reading the graph correctly. Does the datastudio permit people to run what-if scenarios without violating the privacy of the data source? Does it match people who remote attended with their in-person attendance? I'd specifically like to run some nomcom-remain-eligible scenarios. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature