Re: Recall process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Get BlueMail for Android
On Mar 21, 2019, at 11:59, Harald Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/21/19 3:21 AM, S Moonesamy wrote:
Hi Scott,
At 04:53 PM 20-03-2019, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
are you referring to the people who could qualify for the noncom and
those who could not?

just trying to be sure what you are referring to

I was referring to the rule in Section 7 of RFC 7437 which sets the
requirements for qualified signatories.  I was not referring to the
nomcom process.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

when we revisited this 10 years ago, the consensus was that if a recall
petition didn't find enough signatures among the people who were
nomcom-eligible, it was likely not a reasonable recall to pursue anyway.
Unlike with nomcoms, a recall petition only needs a few signatures -
most people who are active in the IETF know someone who's
nomcom-eligible and could try to convince them to sign.

The bar for initiating a recall is pretty low, given the size of the
nomcom-eligible population.

The question we had about the eligible people was if the the prior or current/next meeting was the determing factor



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux