Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
From
: Ted Lemon <mellon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:34:23 -0500
Cc
: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <
5B443648-D155-4AD9-9DB5-2AABC72EEDDF@tzi.org
>
References
: <23402.1551030882@localhost> <CAMm+LwiL8X_+3jOmQrQq5BbT=bZ=Ok6mkDNnxEOo9V6Lg8MtzA@mail.gmail.com> <17062.1551110671@localhost> <
5B443648-D155-4AD9-9DB5-2AABC72EEDDF@tzi.org
>
On Feb 25, 2019, at 12:00 PM, Carsten Bormann <
cabo@xxxxxxx
> wrote:
For CoAP, we don’t want to become dependent on DNS.
Why not?
Follow-Ups
:
Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
From:
Carsten Bormann
References
:
/.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
From:
Michael Richardson
Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
From:
Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
From:
Michael Richardson
Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
From:
Carsten Bormann
Prev by Date:
Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
Next by Date:
Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
Previous by thread:
Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
Next by thread:
Re: /.well-known (RFC5785) vs versioned APIs [and EST/RFC7030]
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Mhonarc]
[Fedora Users]
