Richard Barnes <rlb@xxxxxx> wrote:
> To Michael's point, this doesn't advocate for GitHub in particular. But
> clearly wherever possible, we should prefer the tools that contributors
> know.
Agreed. And for HTML/web developers, they know github, and should go with
that. It's a good choice.
The CELLAR WG guys are actually *TOO FAR* onto github, and as co-chair,
I have to ask them to bring things back to the list.
In particular, as noted here and in the WUGH BOF (there isn't a ML by that
name...) that discussion in a pull request does not work well.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
