I have read this (very short) document. I agree with the proposed change to the IANA registry. Let's not collect any unnecessary information from registrants, Russ > On Nov 30, 2018, at 5:03 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the > following document: - 'Update to the TRIP IANA Registry Rules Regarding > Postal Addresses' > <draft-arkko-trip-registry-update-00.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2018-12-28. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This memo updates the IANA registry rules for the Telephony Routing > over IP (TRIP) protocol, by no longer requiring that postal addresses > be included in contact information. > > This memo updates RFC 3219. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arkko-trip-registry-update/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arkko-trip-registry-update/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > >
