Re: Jabber [Was: Plenary questions]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Jabber [Was: Plenary questions]
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 14:41:57 +0700
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <0609B3A4-565D-49D2-894F-0C1634016E16@mnot.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20181107053136.0bdee360@elandnews.com> <2F55AA2A-D994-4FE1-80B3-B3628F88B14B@cooperw.in> <F378A9F9-6136-477F-B845-408F41FDD4FB@employees.org> <0609B3A4-565D-49D2-894F-0C1634016E16@mnot.net>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

> Perhaps the IETF needs to admit defeat here...

my memory is that xmpp was originaly brought into the ietf to be rubber
stamped.

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jabber [Was: Plenary questions]
  - From: Nico Williams
- Re: Jabber [Was: Plenary questions]
  - From: Patrik Fältström

References:
- Plenary questions
  - From: S Moonesamy
- Re: Plenary questions
  - From: Alissa Cooper
- Re: Plenary questions
  - From: Ole Troan
- Jabber [Was: Plenary questions]
  - From: Mark Nottingham

Prev by Date: Re: Challenges with Jabber clients - Re: Plenary questions
Next by Date: Re: Jabber [Was: Plenary questions]
Previous by thread: Jabber [Was: Plenary questions]
Next by thread: Re: Jabber [Was: Plenary questions]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux